A middle-aged woman had a heart attack and was taken to hospital.  While on the operating table she had a near-death experience.  Seeing God she asked, “Is my time up?” 

God said, “No, you have another 43 years, 2 months and 8 days to live.” 

Upon hearing this, the woman decided to stay in the hospital and have a facelift.  She even had someone change her hair colour.  She was released from the hospital and while crossing the road she was killed by a car. 

Arriving in front of God she demanded, “I thought you said I had 43 years, 2 months and 8 days to live?  Why didn’t you pull me out of the path of the car?” 

God replied, “I didn’t recognize you.”

Alcohol and tobacco are more dangerous than some illegal drugs like marijuana or ecstasy and should be classified as such in legal systems, according to a new British study.

In research published  in The Lancet, Professor David Nutt of Britain’s Bristol University and colleagues proposed a new framework for the classification of harmful substances, based on the actual risks posed to society. Their ranking listed alcohol and tobacco among the top 10 most dangerous substances.

The study’s authors used three factors to determine the harm associated with any drug: the physical harm to the user; the drug’s potential for addiction; and the impact on society of the drug’s use.

The researchers asked two groups of experts — psychiatrists specialising in addiction and legal or police officials with scientific or medical expertise — to assign scores to 20 different drugs, including heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, amphetamines  and LSD. Nutt and his colleagues then calculated the drugs’ overall rankings.

Heroin and cocaine were ranked most dangerous, followed by barbiturates and street methadone. Alcohol was the fifth most harmful drug and tobacco the ninth most harmful. Cannabis came in 11th, and near the bottom of the list was ecstasy.

Tobacco causes 40 per cent of all hospital illnesses, while alcohol is blamed for more than half of all visits to hospital emergency rooms. The substances also harm society in other ways, damaging families and occupying police services.

Nutt hopes that the research will provoke debate within the UK and beyond about how drugs — including socially acceptable drugs such as alcohol — should be regulated. While different countries use different markers to classify dangerous drugs, none uses a system like the one proposed by Nutt’s study, which he hopes could serve as a framework for international authorities.

“This is a landmark paper,” said Dr Leslie Iversen, Professor of Pharmacology at Oxford University.  “It is the first real step towards an evidence-based classification of drugs.”

“The rankings also suggest the need for better regulation of the more harmful drugs that are currently legal, i.e. tobacco and alcohol,” wrote Wayne Hall, of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, in an accompanying Lancet commentary.

While experts agreed that criminalizing alcohol and tobacco would be challenging, they said that governments should review the penalties imposed for drug abuse and try to make them more reflective of the actual risks and damages involved.

Associated Press, 23 March 2007